They Have Ears Everywhere (9/26/03)
SceneLink
 

It's Friday again, kids, and you know what that means: it's time once again for AtAT's End-O'-Week Dose-O'-Paranoia! Because honestly, what's a weekend without frequent nervous glances over your shoulder and that little seed of doubt burning a hole through the bottom of your stomach? Heck, without those, you might as well relax until next week or some such crazy thing. What are we, hippies? Exactly. So get ready to sweat!

To start off, we should mention that when we first heard about the imminent report promoted by the Computer and Communications Industry Association a couple of days ago, we didn't mention it because to us it fell squarely into "Dog Bites Man" territory. You probably know about this thing, right? CNET revealed that the anti-Microsoft CCIA was about to publicize a new independent report "asserting that the software giant's dominance in key technologies threatens the national infrastructure." And sure, the whole national security spin on the topic is sorta juicy, we suppose, but when all's said and done, what we're talking about here on a fundamental level is a pack of geeks bellyaching about Microsoft-- which is about as rare as a one-headed, two-winged chicken with feathers. Not much drama to suck out of that sitch, and we know that our viewers, as discriminating drama hounds, demand better.

(Of course, we then regaled you instead with tales of how Motorola was selling something that turned out not to be its PowerPC business to someone that turned out not to be Apple, and it all wound up drier than a cracker-on-toast sandwich with a side of sawdust. What can we say? It's our deep-seated cluelessness about what we're doing two-thirds of the time that makes us so gosh-darned lovable.)

Anyway, the report did surface as expected, and it does indeed assert that Microsoft's "near ubiquity in personal computing" has rendered most computer networks-- including those of the U.S. government-- vulnerable to "massive, cascading failures." Oooh, nice! 9 out of 10 for style, but since we knew all this already, it's maybe a 4 from the East German judge for actual dramatic content, right? Except that the aftermath of the report's release is arguably a whole lot scarier than anything you'll find within its pages.

How's this for drama? Faithful viewer Dana Sutton slid us a Washington Post article revealing that the report's first-listed author, Daniel Geer, has apparently been unceremoniously stripped of his job at computer security firm @stake, Inc. where he had been the Chief Technical Officer. @stake released a statement that Geer is "no longer associated" with the firm and that his coauthorship of the CCIA report "was not sanctioned" by @stake and "the values and opinions of the report are not in line with [the firm's] views." This despite the fact that Geer and the other authors made it clear that "they were speaking for themselves, not the companies or organizations" with which they're affiliated.

Interestingly enough-- and you never would have guessed this in a million billion years-- @stake does a little business with Microsoft; just last June @stake completed a security analysis of .NET versus IBM's competing WebSphere framework-- analysis that was "funded by Microsoft" and which, surprise to end all surprises, concludes that "the .NET framework on Windows Server 2003 better complies with security best practices and requires less effort to secure." Gee, so we've got a Microsoft-funded report that extols the virtues of Microsoft security (which is twelve kinds of suspicious in and of itself), followed by the "sudden departure" of an employee who had spoken out against Microsoft's very lack of security. Suppose there's any connection? (Don't think about it too hard.)

So what we have here, ladles and gentlemints, is a fairly obvious case of someone losing his livelihood for publicly criticizing Microsoft in a non-job context-- and that's what should instill a little extra jolt of paranoia into your days off. Just remember this the next time you say anything doubleplusungood about Big Redmond; they have ways of finding out, and if you're not careful you'll wind up jobless and sitting in Room 101 with a rat caged to your head. Enjoy the weekend!

 
SceneLink (4233)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 9/26/03 episode:

September 26, 2003: Apple's market share is way, way up-- provided you're looking at the right numbers. Meanwhile, analysts predict that Apple will be among the first computer companies whose sales will benefit from an economic rebound, and it's official: bad-mouthing Microsoft (even on your own time) can get you fired so fast your head will spin...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4231: The Seven Percent Solution (9/26/03)   Hey, you-- morose person. Why the long face, Horace? Still dwelling on Apple's market share numbers? Now, you know that's not good for you; why are you torturing yourself this way? No matter how many times you picture that neon floating "5%" (or 4%, or 3%, or whatever equally- or more-upsetting figure you happen to believe this week), it's just not going to look any happier, incessant comparisons to BMW's market share notwithstanding...

  • 4232: Yeah, Get In Line, Buddy (9/26/03)   So whaddaya think, is the economy finally getting better? The only reason we even consider the remote possibility is because the number of wild-eyed bank officials clinging desperately to our pants legs and begging us to take out a series of low-interest loans has dropped back into the single digits, and for one brief shining moment earlier in the week, the AtAT stock portfolio had actually edged into the black by six whole bucks!...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1246 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).