About That Profit Thing... (12/27/01)
SceneLink
 

Attention everybody who heard Apple's original prediction that Apple's retail stores would be profitable right away and immediately snorted in utter disbelief: your pessimism, while perhaps unattractive, was right on the money. In other words, you were right that Apple wouldn't make any money-- at least not in the first year of its retail initiative. AtAT's resident fact-checker and Goddess of Minutiae Katie happened to notice that Apple filed its annual 10-K form yesterday, and while we're about as likely to go crawling through over eighty pages of financial data as we are to star in a Broadway musical based on Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, luckily there are always condensed info-bites from Reuters for us to fall back on-- and apparently those spiffy retail stores are going to be bleeding a little red ink for a while yet.

That's no reason to start panicking, of course, so if you were headed to the corner to huddle naked in a fetal position while rocking back and forth and muttering "I can't go back to CompUSA I can't go back to CompUSA," hold up a minute. Things really aren't that bad; instead of the originally-predicted break-even quarter and small profit for the year, Apple now expects its AppleGaps to report a "small loss" in both time frames. That's not the end of the world-- nor is it the end of the Apple stores. So if you've been using Apple's immaculate Australian-floor-tiled bathrooms instead of the official mall ones out by the food court, relax; you don't have to go back to the cesspools just yet.

For one thing, Apple states that the stores' impending "small loss" won't be due to anything fundamentally wrong with the company's retail strategy, but rather to-- surprise, surprise-- "the continued deterioration of the U.S. economy and the after-effects of the events of Sept. 11." Sure, a loss is a loss, but if the strategy is sound then that loss should turn to profit if the economy as a whole ever improves. And Apple's got enough cash to ride out the storm until then; in fact, the company is even planning on spending another $200 million on "capital expenditures" this year, and a big chunk of that is reportedly earmarked for "more Apple-branded retail stores," according to AFXpress.

Personally, we always figured that the retail stores might be a money-losing venture, but we always felt that was just fine; in our eyes, any loss those 27-and-counting stores might report should just be considered a marketing expense. More than anything else, the stores are big, gleaming Apple ads, spreading the gospel and sticking the company logo in the faces of millions of shoppers across the country who might otherwise never even think of "Apple" as anything other than a Jolly Rancher flavor. So red ink, shmed ink-- here's hoping those stores keep sprouting up next year, and more power to them.

 
SceneLink (3474)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 12/27/01 episode:

December 27, 2001: Apple backpedals; its retail stores are now expected to lose money in fiscal 2002. Meanwhile, Steve Jobs once again made $1 for running Apple for another year, and Palm finally releases a Mac OS X version of its desktop software (sort of)...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3475: 200%? Now THAT'S A Raise (12/27/01)   Faithful viewer Paul pointed out another juicy little nugget extracted from the murky depths of Apple's 84-page 10-K form: as reported by ZDNet News, Steve Jobs's regular annual salary for fiscal 2001 was, once again, a dollar...

  • 3476: Can't Get Our Palms On It (12/27/01)   Great Aunt Gertrude, we never thought we'd see the day-- but it's finally out! Well, sort of. It's just a public beta, so it's not really out, out. And your odds of successfully downloading it before the next Ice Age arrives currently look pretty slim, since at broadcast time the server on which it resides was being flooded with a torrent of so much pent-up demand from long-suffering users that it makes the Slashdot effect look like a dripping faucet by comparison...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1245 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).