On The Road To Portability (8/31/04)
SceneLink
 

Like we said, considering what the machine manages to do, we don't feel overly strongly about the look of the iMac G5 either way, so we're standing well off to the side while those who are a bit more pro or con on the subject hurl opinions, insults, fists, lawn darts, etc. at each other. And guess what? There are actually quite a few others here on the sidelines, but instead of relaxing quietly to the soothing soundtrack of witty barbs and the occasional shriek accompanying a lawn dart-related maiming like we are, they're all excitedly huddling around well-worn printouts of the new iMac's tech specs and jumping up and down. See, these are the guys who wouldn't care if Apple shipped a consumer desktop that was fuchsia and chartreuse and molded from the hindquarters of a hippo with psoriasis, because 1) they're professionals, not consumers, and 2) they can't get down to business with a desktop that just sits there. These are the Road Warriors, and they need Apple's pro portables, otherwise known as PowerBooks. And many of them are practically foaming at the mouth right about now.

The thing is, not all of them are foaming for the same reasons. Some are just apoplectic that Apple has broken its longstanding tradition and released a consumer Mac that outpaces one of its pro ones; even the current top-of-the-line PowerBook only packs a 1.5 GHz G4, and now the entry-level iMac (at less than half the price) has a 1.6 GHz G5. Sure, you pay for portability, but as far as we can recall, this is still the first time in recent memory that a consumer Mac has shipped at a faster clock speed than a pro model-- let alone with a next-generation processor, to boot.

The other guys, though, are foaming with anticipation, because they're seeing all the guts of a G5 Mac crammed into a system that's just two inches thick. And after hearing time and time again (from Apple, no less) that stuffing a G5 into as tight a space as necessitated by a PowerBook is still waaaaay off in the future, the new iMac would seem to be the proof that a G5 PowerBook isn't as distant a dream as they've been led to believe. Granted, there are still hurdles to clear; for one thing, two inches is about an inch thicker than a PowerBook can realistically get. But keep in mind that while the 17-inch LCD that Apple uses in its PowerBooks and its displays are probably the same, the backlights placed behind them are not-- Apple tends to use brighter and bulkier backlights when it doesn't have to worry about saving battery power. So a fair chunk of that two-inch thickness in the iMac G5 might be backlight-related, and therefore irrelevant in a PowerBook G5 discussion.

There's also the matter of all that extra space underneath the iMac's screen, which would obviously make a 17-inch PowerBook nearly four inches deeper, and no one's going to lug something like that all over creation. But keep in mind that the iMac's speakers live in that space, and bounce sound downward off the desk; we have no idea how much of that space those speakers take up, but bearing in mind that a consumer desktop (especially one touted as "built for iLife") has to have some decent sound to it, there's at least a chance that eliminating those particular speakers might allow the footprint to shrink a little. And don't forget that the iMac's entire power supply is internal! Ripping that out in favor of the traditional PowerBook AC adapter ought to free up a lot more room.

Room for the battery that'd have to be added, that is. Hmm. Never mind.

Whatever. Look, no one's suggesting that Apple can just toss a hinged screen on an iMac, spray-paint it aluminum, throw it in a black box, and ship it as a PowerBook G5. But considering that the only systems in which we've seen G5 processors running to date are the Power Mac (with its nine fans, four thermal zones, and an enclosure the size of Montana) and the Xserve (which is at least thinnish-- but over two feet deep), the iMac G5 is clearly a massive leap forward towards a PowerBook G5 from those two behemoths. At a time when the rumor mill is only talking about the next PowerBook revision only upping the G4 from 1.5 GHz to 1.6 GHz, the iMac G5 represents hope that we really will get to see 64-bit Mac portables shipping sometime before our grandkids go on Medicare. And that, we feel, totally justifies a few flecks of mouth foam here and there.

 
SceneLink (4892)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 8/31/04 episode:

August 31, 2004: It's finally here: the iMac G5 hits the runway in Paris. Meanwhile, Apple's ability to cram a G5 into its svelte new iMac enclosure restores hope to those still waiting for a PowerBook G5, even as the company yanks the Virex 7.5 update it posted for .Mac subscribers pending the investigation of "technical issues"-- like, say, having your inbox deleted...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4891: What, No Giant Click Wheel? (8/31/04)   And thus is any remaining pretense tossed straight out the window. Steve's claim that Apple had decided "not to use the iPod to drive people to Macs" is looking thinner and thinner, isn't it? The way Apple tells it, you'd think it was surprised at reports of a "halo effect" boosting Mac sales among the iPod-using population, as if this were a totally unplanned consequence of selling the world's hottest portable music player to Wintel users...

  • 4893: Downgrade, Will Robinson! (8/31/04)   We're sure you must be in a state of iMac G5 Overload by now, given that every sentient being on this plane of existence is weighing in with an opinion, so how about we switch gears for a while? Let's see, here, in terms of other plot choices, we've got... irretrievable data loss and Hewlett-Packard turning iPods into bling-bling...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1239 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).