Randomizer Of The Gods (8/26/04)
SceneLink
 

Hey, look, Apple released an iPod with a color screen that shows album art and has a big, wacky pull-handle on the side! Oh, wait, never mind-- it's just some designer at the New York Times having a bit of Photoshop fun. Faithful viewer Mark Murray forwarded us the link to a surprisingly in-depth study of the iPod's "Shuffle" feature, which, as you all know, lets you put the selection of your tunes into the amorphous yet all-powerful hands of a higher power. Shuffle is evidently a huge hit with the four million or so 'Podders out there, because Apple made a big deal about moving the option up out of the "Settings" section and right onto the latest iPod's main menu. When removing one level of menu selection from access to a feature becomes a major selling point, you're either out of ideas or people really want to get at said feature now now now. And you know that Apple isn't out of ideas.

So what is it about the iPod's Shuffle feature that holds the music-loving populace in such thrall? According to the Times, it's the perception that Apple's Randomizer isn't so random after all. The article tells the sad tale of one Mr. Bob Angus, who was publicly emasculated at his own party when his iPod chose to follow up a rousing Guns 'N' Roses selection by playing an Elton John ballad (probably as karmic realignment for Bob having used Canadian quarters in the washing machines or something). A bicyclist in L.A. insists that his iPod always knows just when to throw 50 Cent's "In Da Club" into the mix to get him pumped back up when his pedals aren't pushing, but invariably plays the one Ruben Studdard track on the drive whenever he's working out in the gym. A web designer claims that while he only has two Fugazi albums loaded, his iPod plays songs from them "to a degree wildly disproportionate" to the space they take up in its library. (Then again, he lives in Salem, Massachusetts, so in this case maybe it's a haunted-by-dead-witches-who-like-indie-rock sort of thing.)

We've heard of-- and experienced-- similarly spooky Shuffle behavior ourselves, so we're not surprised that some people are convinced that the iPod's Shuffle can "learn" over time, or, perhaps more realistically, is actually a conduit to a jealous god with a quick temper who can mete out praise or punishment with one flick of his Mighty Click Wheel. But Stan Ng, Apple's director of iPod product marketing, insists that Shuffle is just your basic vanilla randomizer: "When you turn on Shuffle Songs, it creates a randomized list of all the music on your iPod without repeating a song" and there's "no way that an iPod can be a 'fan' of a particular artist or band." Furthermore, Stan claims that Shuffle's randomization algorithm has remained the same since the original 5 GB model shipped lo those many Octobers ago.

Of course, if you buy all that, you're just not paying attention. AtAT mystics have devoted countless hours to determining the true origin of Shuffle's choices, and have traced them back to a minor deity from the Roman pantheon-- the original Roman pantheon (that of Jeff, god of biscuits), prior to when they just renamed all the Greek gods in an inspired act of religious efficiency. So when your Shuffle play embarrasses you or otherwise causes you pain, it's because you've somehow offended Carl, god of playlists, and you may have to burn him an offering to appease his anger. We hear he likes Hot Pockets-- any flavor but Chicken & Cheddar with Broccoli.

 
SceneLink (4885)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 8/26/04 episode:

August 26, 2004: Apple's stock skyrockets again, and not for much of a reason. Meanwhile, Hewlett-Packard holds a contest in which the grand prize is a trio of Macs, and despite Apple's insistence to the contrary, there's clearly something decidedly un-random about the iPod's Shuffle function...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4883: And Use A Plastic Spatula (8/26/04)   Longtime viewers know that we here at the AtAT compound know roughly as much about our stock portfolio as we do about the Krebs cycle: we know it exists, and that it's probably sort of important, but for the most part we just assume that if we leave well enough alone and don't think about it too hard it'll take care of itself...

  • 4884: This Am Bizarro Contest (8/26/04)   Speaking of Hewlett-Packard, we have to say, it's probably the only major Wintel manufacturer for which we hold any real respect at the moment. Not that we like their Wintels, mind you-- we really don't know anything about them at all, except that they run Windows, which is all we need to know...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1245 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).