Not Paying? Sic 'Em, Sacem! (3/10/04)
SceneLink
 

French Week continues here at AtAT; on Monday we linked to a French article about a possible date for a Power Mac G5 speed-bump, and yesterday we pointed you towards another French piece about Apple's deadbeat status due to its refusal to pay almost two years' worth of royalties on French-sold iPods. Well, rather than break the streak, we're sticking with the royalties plotline today-- but even though our setting is once again the sweaty jungles and endless desert vistas of France, we figured we'd cut you a break on all the français lately and link to a followup article that was written natively in English. (Indeed, we've been informed that it's our patriotic duty as Lazy Americans™ to pretend that no other languages exist, and we really can't face another freakin' treason charge.)

So here goes: the Associated Press has a little more info on that whole iPod royalty commotion busting out down in France, and it sounds like Apple may well soon have yet another lawsuit on its hands. The Society of Music Creators, Composers, and Publishers (which has the oh-so-euphonic French acronym of "Sacem") estimates that Apple sold about 20,000 iPods on French soil last year alone, which, at a levy of €10 a pop, comes out to roughly $245,000 in American filthy lucre; add in all the iPods sold this year so far and the ones sold after July in 2002, factor in the levy's sliding scale (reportedly it's €20 on a 40 GB iPod), and we're probably talking about a third of a million smackers that Apple owes to French musicians. That's not exactly chicken feed, and as such, if Apple doesn't cough up soon, Sacem "will have no other option than to go immediately to court to make sure that the rights of artists, composers, and producers are respected."

Suddenly, Apple's motive in all this becomes startlingly clear: it's not that it doesn't have the cash, or doesn't want to spend the cash, or feels that the €10-per-iPod tariff is fundamentally flawed or unfair (e.g. the fee assumes that customers will use the iPod to pirate music and forces Apple to pay for that); it's that Steve is collecting lawsuits by recording artists as if they're baseball cards or something. Think about it for a second. Apple is already facing lawsuits by the Beatles and Eminem, who are (albeit in grossly different ways) a couple of the biggest acts to grace the last few decades of popular music. And now, by not paying these royalties, Steve is about to bolster his collection with a lawsuit basically filed by all French recording artists in one fell swoop. Say what you will about the man, but he's nothing if not efficient.

If we're right about this, then we can expect word of Sacem's legal action any day now-- and then all that remains is trying to figure out whom Steve will try to annoy next. Let's see, here... the Beatles, then Eminem, then France... Hey, how about Metallica? They like to sue a lot. Or is that not enough of a challenge?

 
SceneLink (4559)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 3/10/04 episode:

March 10, 2004: A French organization of recording artists threatens to sue Apple over those unpaid iPod royalties. Meanwhile, Apple fights for trademark status to use its logo on clothing in China, and an article in a Mac magazine gives technical advice that can screw things up a smidge...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4560: Going Logo Loco In China (3/10/04)   Hey, speaking of lawsuits, Apple's involved in another legal battle right now-- and believe it or not, this one's actually not music-related. We're in luck, too, because while we've got this whole French streak going, here, we've actually gotten some complaints from viewers who like the new international flavor AtAT's taken on this week, but aren't crazy about our apparent obsession with the French...

  • 4561: You Poor, Trusting FOOLS (3/10/04)   Hey, kids, it's Wednesday (sort of), and you all know what that means: it's time for this week's Jaded Rule of Life(TM)! In previous weeks we've shared our world-weary wisdom (accumulated via decades of bitter, bitter mistakes) by illustrating the disheartening eternal truth of such pessimistic maxims as "she's only after your money, stupid" and "there's no such thing as a free eggroll, or at least not one that you'd actually want to eat."...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1247 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).