Someone Get A Slide Rule (12/9/03)
SceneLink
 

Say, it's been a while since we last checked in with an iTunes Music Store sales update, and that used to be a mainstay in the Apple-flavored melodrama biz, so what say we scope the skinny on the millions tip? (No, we're not sure what that means, either.) CNET corroborates a figure mentioned in that Jobs interview in Rolling Stone to which we incoherently linked yesterday: reportedly the iTMS has now sold 20 million songs since it launched at the end of last April. Why, that's enough to fill 2,000 top-of-the-line iPods! Which is either a lot or not so much, depending on how you look at it.

Now, as you all know, the iTMS represents a whole new way to distribute music, and it's struggling to build some street cred so that people don't look at it as just another hula hoop-style fad that'll fizzle by March. The best way to do that, of course, would be for iTMS sales to overtake sales of traditional physical CDs. The thing is, 20 million songs since April may not sound like a lot when compared to the number of songs Americans buy on CD in a year (10 billion, apparently), but hey, it's still a significant pile in its own right, and a journey of 10 billion steps starts with... um... well, it probably starts with some sort of travel itinerary or something, and maybe a really fine CamelBak, but we're sure there's 20 million steps in there somewhere. And besides, Apple still has over three months to go before its first year is up-- and it only has to sell another 9,980,000,000 in that time to catch up. How hard can that be, right?

Of course, our math's a little rusty, but we suspect that in order for Apple to hit that goal, sales would have to accelerate just slightly.

Let's try to work this out, shall we? As of October 16th, Apple tells us that it had sold "more than 13 million" songs. Just a few days later on October 20th that had climbed to "14 million ." Fast-forward two and a half weeks to November 6th and the total had come to "more than 17 million." And then, as of yesterday, another four and a half weeks of sales had upped the total to 20 million. So after the introduction of iTunes for Windows, it sounds like Apple had been selling roughly 2 million songs a week, then about 1.2 million a week, and most recently maybe 860,000 songs a week.

Waitaminnit-- call us crazy, but those numbers look like they're getting smaller. We're not experts or anything, but that's the general sense we get by looking at them; we'd have to consult a statistician or something to find out for sure. If they are shrinking, though, then we imagine that might be a slight bump in the road on the way to eclipsing CD sales. In order to reach that lofty goal, by our figuring, Apple needs to increase its weekly sales rate just a smidge-- to about 670 million songs a week. By Thursday. Kind of tough if sales are tapering off.

But here's how we can make it happen: by our estimates, if every AtAT viewer commits to buying a mere 40,000 songs each week between now and the end of April, Apple can pull it off! And remember, that doesn't necessarily mean you have to spend $40,000 a week; why, with some albums containing fifteen or even twenty songs for a flat $9.99, you'd probably only have to cough up about $30,000. Okay, maybe $35,000. So get spending!

 
SceneLink (4380)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/9/03 episode:

December 9, 2003: Goofball analyst Rob Enderle's at it again, this time claiming that Apple's doomed because it doesn't make tablets, PDAs, or cell phones. Meanwhile, the iTunes Music Store has a long way to go before it comes close to overtaking sales of traditional CDs, and even as demand for portable MP3 players gets set to skyrocket, Apple may have a low-cost iPod waiting in the wings...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4379: And They PAY Him For This? (12/9/03)   Great jumpin' lobotomized tree sloths, it's Enderle Time once again! Yes, Enderle Time, that joyous periodic occasion on which we celebrate the latest anti-Apple ramblings to spew forth from analyst Rob Enderle, who at this point is clearly just poking Mac users with sticks in hopes of stirring up a little web traffic-- but hey, since his drivel is so gosh-darn amusing, we see no reason not to give him what he wants...

  • 4381: Soon: iPods For The Poor (12/9/03)   Okay, so iTunes Music Store sales may be shrinking a bit; don't let it bum you out. Remember, Apple probably loses a little money on every song sale-- it's only peddling tunes in the first place so that it can sell more iPods, which do make money...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1241 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).