HyperTransport, Hyper Fans (6/13/03)
SceneLink
 

Being the caring and compassionate souls that we are, we still feel just a wee bit guilty about having inadvertently sent dozens of highly-strung Mac fans to their self-inflicted deaths by mentioning that there are a couple of people in this world who aren't sure that the Power Mac G5 will be done in time for WWDC. As restitution, we'd like to send our viewing audience (the segment that's still breathing, that is) hurtling into the weekend with a fresh supply of Hope on a Rope. It's the least we can do.

Actually, no-- the least we can do is sit around eating grapes and watching "Family Guy" on TiVo. And we could also opt to do harm instead of good by pointing at the grieving families of the deceased and giggling. So you have to admit, we're being pretty darn saintly, here.

So here's our good deed for the week: faithful viewer Bill Brown informed us of a CNET article which we're in turn passing along to you. It cites "sources" who claim that Apple plans to "discuss how it will incorporate HyperTransport, a rapid chip-to-chip communications technology, into future computers later this month at its developer conference." Yes, that's right, friends; contrary to popular belief, HyperTransport is not the name of Federal Express's new same-hour delivery service. Like the article says, it's actually a super-zippy chip-to-chip communications architecture that can move data at positively stupid rates of speed.

Now, the fact that Apple is going to stick HyperTransport into future Macs isn't really much of a revelation, seeing as the company became a founding member of the HyperTransport Consortium almost two full years ago, and the Apple logo is plainly displayed right on the consortium's home page. But the fact that HyperTransport can shuttle data between chips at the ridiculous rate of 12.8 gigabytes per second certainly implies that at least one of the chips involved in that transfer should actually be able to do something with a data stream that fast. According to noted authority Mr. Chip Guy, since HyperTransport would almost certainly be overkill for the current G4 processors available (whose processing pipelines, he claims, can be saturated by two tin cans and a piece of string), the implication is that if HyperTransport Macs are unveiled at the conference, they'll almost certainly have PowerPC 970s inside. (Note: Mr. Chip Guy is actually a hand puppet and has no credentials whatsoever.)

Then again, note that the article just says that Apple plans to "discuss" how it "will incorporate HyperTransport... into future computers," which we suppose you could interpret as meaning that Apple hasn't actually incorporated it yet into any computers that exist on this physical plane, and that HyperTransport and the 970 aren't going to come to the Mac until sometime well after-- No, wait, we didn't say that! Put down the pills! PUT DOWN THE PILLS!!

Ah, whatever. Where'd we put those grapes?

 
SceneLink (4012)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 6/13/03 episode:

June 13, 2003: Word has it that Apple's cooking up something HyperTransporty for WWDC. Meanwhile, Microsoft confirms that Internet Explorer for the Mac is officially kaput, and an Asian manufacturer reports its first order for PowerBooks with 15.4-inch screens...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4013: One Down; More To Go? (6/13/03)   Say, remember when were musing that Microsoft might be looking to drop Internet Explorer for the Mac? Well, faithful viewer Sledgehammer Smythe tells us that it just happened. Since we suspect that some of you wouldn't just take some guy's word for it (Sledgehammer, man, they're dissing your credibility!)...

  • 4014: How Long's YOUR Diagonal? (6/13/03)   You know, what with all the hubbub over the alleged Power Mac G5 probably surfacing in a week and a half, a lot of people are forgetting that there's another unannounced Mac whose chances of a WWDC intro are, if anything, even more assured...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1239 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).