The New iMac's Evil Twin (1/10/02)
SceneLink
 

Controversy junkies, rejoice! If your incredible thirst for overwrought conflict wasn't sated by the tussle over whether the industrial design of Apple's new iMac is a brilliant organic expression of the functional digital hub experience or just resembles a half-deflated volleyball with a nice LCD screen jammed through its top by virtue of a shiny stick, now you can top yourself off with the question of whether or not Apple may have swiped said design from a fan. How's that for a veritable cornucopia of tasty drama? It's like there's a party in my mouth and everyone's invited!

See, faithful viewer Rupert Chappelle breathlessly alerted us to a WIRED article which relates the story of one Vincent Jeunejean, a Belgian web designer who finds the look of Apple's new iMac startlingly familiar-- and not because he's got a thing for table lamps. It seems that ol' Vincent sketched his own concept design for an LCD iMac sometime last June, and it really is strikingly similar to what Steve just unveiled on Monday. There's just a plain stick instead of the new iMac's adjustable display arm, and you may have to squint a little to see a real resemblance, but if you look at it in the right light it's almost spooky: there's the dome-shaped base unit with the Apple logo on the front and the ports on the back, the pole coming out of the top, and the flat-screen display mounted centrally on the pole. Vincent's sketch is so close to the shipping product, in fact, that he believes that Apple flat-out copied it.

Now, before you start picturing Steve dispatching a team of ninjas to Belgium to break into Vincent's house just to swipe a rough sketch of a proposed iMac design, we should probably mention that Vincent had scanned his artwork and submitted it to The Apple Collection, so his design has been publicly accessible for over six months. Furthermore, The Apple Collection confirms via its log files that "Apple employees visit the site every week," and even if they didn't, well, Vincent also just happens to have emailed a copy directly to Steve Jobs.

So did Jon Ive, in a fit of "designer's block," steal Vincent's design? It hardly seems likely, since we have to assume that the basic elements of the new iMac were locked down well over six months ago for it to be (sort of) available now; Apple claims that the product has been in the works for two years. In any case, the point is most probably moot, since Apple's Unsolicited Idea Submission Policy is pretty ironclad: "(1) your ideas will automatically become the property of Apple, without compensation to you, and (2) Apple can use the ideas for any purpose and in any way, even give them to others." In other words, when Vincent emailed that sketch to Steve, he may well have given up any rights to the design.

All drama aside, there isn't anything so terribly outré about the essential design of Apple's new iMac (for the most part, it's just a logical form following function), so in all likelihood this is just a nifty coincidence. Chalk it up to great minds thinking alike, and who knows? Maybe Apple's industrial design gurus will offer Vincent a job...

 
SceneLink (3497)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 1/10/02 episode:

January 10, 2002: A web designer in Belgium thinks that Apple may have ripped off his iMac design. Meanwhile, are USB ports multiplying, or is Apple just fudging the numbers a little? And why on earth would anyone blow extra cash on a Power Mac and separate display now that the new iMac is such a powerhouse?...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3498: Just Bending The Truth (1/10/02)   Truth in advertising-- impossible, you say? While it's true that the whole point of marketing and advertising is generally to make a product seem much better (and therefore more necessary) than it really is, occasionally we're lucky enough to stumble upon some entity keeping the hyperbole out of its adspeak...

  • 3499: Ten Minutes To Wapner (1/10/02)   We're getting an awful lot of mail from irate Mac users wondering whatever happened to those GHz-level Power Macs that many of us had been expecting this week. Specifically, lots of people are wondering why on earth Apple would expect anyone to shell out roughly $2300 for the current 733 MHz Power Mac G4 and a 15-inch display when they could save $500 by grabbing a new top-of-the-line iMac instead-- especially since the iMac has a faster processor, twice the RAM, 50% more storage space, and a SuperDrive, whereas all the Power Mac has is upgradeability, a faster system bus, and probably a bigger cardboard box...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1237 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).