But We Know What We Like (8/17/01)
SceneLink
 

You know that old saw, "be careful what you wish for"? We're thinking that Apple's marketing department might want to take that advice a little more seriously now that its ad copy has apparently come true, with disastrous consequences. Those of you mourners still looking for a scapegoat on whom to blame the passing of the Power Mac G4 Cube, we're happy to report that we've found one for you: whoever penned the Cube ad that said the product "looks like it belongs in the Museum of Modern Art." Because as we all know, dead things go in museums, and, sure enough, the Cube really did find its way into MoMA's collection-- just prior to its demise.

No joke: according to the New York Times, Apple's cubic-- or is that Cubist?-- interpretation of its (slightly) more conventional Power Mac G4 boasts such a stunning design, the museum recently "acquired" one for its design collection. Granted, this isn't the first Mac to wind up in the hallowed halls of MoMA; the original 1984 Macintosh led the charge. Neither is the Cube likely to be the last, and indeed, the Cube was inducted along with "six other Apple products" whose identities aren't revealed. Still, we can't ignore the extraordinary coincidence that first Apple's own ad touts the Cube as looking like it belongs in MoMA, then MoMA adds the Cube to its collection, and then the Cube disappears from Apple's price list. (Here's hoping that the Deco-looking Quicksilver isn't part of the collection, because we don't want it to vanish before we have a chance to buy one.)

This whole issue of "tempting the fates" aside, Steve Jobs (certainly the Cube's spiritual daddy) states that he and the rest of Apple are "surprised and honored" by the Cube's acceptance into MoMA. According to Steve, while the creation didn't enjoy much success as a commercial product, "that was not a failure of design; it was a failure of concept. We targeted the Cube at a professional audience. We thought they would rather have something small on the desk than expandibility and we were wrong. It was a wrong concept-- fabulously implemented." And that, folks, is of course why we love Apple so much: the company makes mistakes, sure... but they're spectacularly well-executed mistakes. Congrats to the Cube for its induction into MoMA; we think it's finally found its market.

On a vaguely-related side note, we guess we can stop wondering whether or not Apple employees tune in to AtAT; it's only been a week since we pointed out the use of the redundant phrase "rounded circles" on the Cube page, and now it just says "circles." Clearly the gods on Mount Cupertino are listening. So let's try a little experiment, shall we? (ahem...) "Gosh, it sure would be nice if we found a fully-loaded Quicksilver on our doorstep tomorrow morning!"

 
SceneLink (3248)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 8/17/01 episode:

August 17, 2001: Think the Cube is a work of modern art? MoMA evidently agrees with you. Meanwhile, Microsoft's latest update to Internet Explorer for Windows "accidentally" breaks QuickTime, and "Redmond Justice" heads into the home stretch as the Court of Appeals denies Microsoft's request for yet another delay...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3249: "Oops, Our Bad-- Tee Hee" (8/17/01)   "Gee, AtAT, how come you haven't worked Microsoft's latest QuickTime-crippling IE upgrade into the script yet?" That's what we're hearing from dozens of fans. (Well, maybe minus the "gee" part; perhaps we need to cut back on our "Leave It To Beaver" intake.)...

  • 3250: Hurtling Toward The Finale (8/17/01)   While we hardly like to characterize the Federal Appeals Court as some sort of "Antitrust Nazi," we can't pass up this chance to summarize its latest message to Microsoft thusly: "NO STAY FOR YOU!!" Yes, kiddies, "Redmond Justice" is back in full swing, and the appeals court continues to surprise and delight fans of antitrust drama by shaking off its early characterization as a Microsoft-friendly entity and instead sending Bill's minions running for cover...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1239 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).